"Dan Christensen" <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:firstname.lastname@example.org... > On Sunday, November 17, 2013 12:14:04 PM UTC-5, Julio Di Egidio wrote: <snip> >> Regardless, you quote elementary algebra books, so not >> addressing objections. > > I don't need elementary algebra books to justify my position.
Yes, but you still do not address any objections to that position. Namely, that you have *not* proved that 0^0 *must* be undefined, you have rather at best provided some formal support to the naive high-school level approach that simply leaves it undefined. Big difference.