Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Proof that mixed partials commute.
Replies: 20   Last Post: Nov 22, 2013 11:57 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Robin Chapman Posts: 40 Registered: 10/29/12
Re: Proof that mixed partials commute.
Posted: Nov 20, 2013 3:22 AM

On 19/11/2013 23:59, Hetware wrote:
>>
>> That's very bad notation. It's not one limit, it's the limit of
>> a limit. Should be
>>
>> Limt(Limt(...)[x->c][y->c].
>>
>> And now the big question is why
>>
>> Limt(Limt(...)[x->c][y->c] = Limt(Limt(...)[y->c][x->c]

>
> I guess I should have included the intermediate steps. I had intended
> that the order of taking limits should be ambiguous.

That's the nub of the matter. Iterated limits need not commute.
One has to show that in this case they do. Putting in deliberate

Of course there are examples where mixed partials are different,
so your original argument can't have been valid, since it didn't
use the necessary hypotheses about continuity of partials etc.

Date Subject Author
11/18/13 Hetware
11/18/13 William Elliot
11/18/13 Hetware
11/19/13 Robin Chapman
11/19/13 David C. Ullrich
11/19/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
11/19/13 Hetware
11/20/13 Robin Chapman
11/20/13 Hetware
11/20/13 David C. Ullrich
11/20/13 Hetware
11/20/13 Ki Song
11/21/13 Robin Chapman
11/21/13 David C. Ullrich
11/20/13 Robin Chapman
11/20/13 Hetware
11/21/13 Robin Chapman
11/21/13 Robin Chapman
11/21/13 David C. Ullrich
11/22/13 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/21/13 Roland Franzius