The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Proof that mixed partials commute.
Replies: 20   Last Post: Nov 22, 2013 11:57 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 148
Registered: 4/13/13
Re: Proof that mixed partials commute.
Posted: Nov 20, 2013 11:26 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 11/20/2013 11:25 AM, Robin Chapman wrote:
> On 20/11/2013 11:55, Hetware wrote:
>> On 11/20/2013 3:22 AM, Robin Chapman wrote:
> The 11th of WHAT?

>>> On 19/11/2013 23:59, Hetware wrote:
>>> Of course there are examples where mixed partials are different,
>>> so your original argument can't have been valid, since it didn't
>>> use the necessary hypotheses about continuity of partials etc.

>> But I added my reason for assuming the limits commute. I expressed a
>> function of two independent variables as the function of a single
>> variable and appealed to the limit rules for a function of a single
>> variable to the result.
>> The question is whether that reasoning is valid.

> I found your original post unreadable, in part due to
> the wilfully obscure notation, but also due to your
> vagueness of quantification.

I prefer to think of my notation as concise, if a bit cryptic; relying
on the intuition of the reader to flesh out the full meaning.

But as I pointed out,
> your argument couldn't have been valid as it failed to
> use some necessary hypotheses. I can't see any value
> in trying to parse your argument in detail trying to
> find the first error; if you had written it in decent
> mathematical English, I might have had a go (and you might
> have noticed any errors yourself!).

There were no errors on my part. Other than a reversal of xy as a
subscript. If you follow my exposition, you will have wisdom. Be

Fact of the matter is, I cannot communicate well in ASCII. I can
express ideas very tightly with the proper symbols. But I am not Kosher
enough to communicate on such fora as .

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.