Am Dienstag, 3. Dezember 2013 04:02:09 UTC+1 schrieb Zeit Geist:
> > > > > > I did not. I know Cantor's first "proof" very well. > > > > > > > If you didn't keep reading, how do you know it was a rendition of Cantor's First Proof?
I saw it immediately. And I know what you seem to have forgotten: The limit of a sequence is never defined by the terms of the sequence, how many you ever may calculate. The limit is defined by the *formula*, the definition of the sequence. This is the starting point of Cantor's first proof: Sei irgendeine Folge *gegeben*. With this assumption the limit is given as a defined number. To waste all naturals for the enumeration of the terms of the sequence is a very simple trick. Not convincing.