In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2013 19:20:53 UTC+1 schrieb wpih...@gmail.com: > > On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 1:44:10 PM UTC-4, WM wrote: > > > > > > > Maybe not. But you certainly defend the position that > > > > arbitrary 0/1 strings do not exist. You cannot have arbitrary > > > > subsets without arbitrary strings. > > > My opinion is of no importance.
> Here we use set theory.
WM has yet to con form his claims to those of any standard set theory.
WM has a made up version of set theory on his own, whose axioms and rules of operation are known only to WM, and seem suspiciously variable, supporting claims when made by WM but refuting those same claims when made by others. --