In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com wrote:
> On Saturday, 21 December 2013 21:15:47 UTC+1, Virgil wrote: > > In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
> > email@example.com wrote:
> > > My very lose understanding of infinity, we can construct an > > > algorithm that create an unfinite number terms in a list the > > > simplest would be 1+1+1..., but we can not ever complete the list > > > and never find the last member.
> > Since infinite lists by definition do not have last members, not > > being able to find one is a GOOD thing.
> Since infinite sequences by definition have infinitely many terms > following beyond every term, and every term is belonging to a finite > initial sequence, not finding nearly all terms is a good thing.
Only in the Wilds of Wolkenmuekenheim.
For any sequence given by formula, one has already found ALL terms, and THAT is a good thing.. --