In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com wrote:
> On Friday, 27 December 2013 06:39:44 UTC+1, Virgil wrote: > > Den m?ndagen den 23:e december 2013 kl. 22:31:27 UTC+1 skrev Virgil: > > > > In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, > > > > email@example.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > Give one natural number that is individualized > > > > > > > > OUTSIDE of Wolkenmuekenheim , there is no such process in mathematics as > > the "individualizing" of a number". > > Only in matheology numbers can be believed to exist without being > individualized.
If WM claims that "individualizing" numbers is so central to all mathematics, WM should certainly be able to provide some standard formal definition of what "individualizing" a number consists of, AND show that that definition is widely accepted in mathematics. --