dpb <email@example.com> wrote in message <firstname.lastname@example.org>...
> Been puzzling over your last comment, Bruno...couldn't decide what you > meant by "recomputing it". I guess you're speaking of the logical test > to select nonzero elements instead of just a direct use of the logical > addressing vector.
Yes, (ib > 0) is identical as t, wht throw it away with "~" ?
> > The problem I see with sort() is that I think in the general case the > results could be jumbled since the two matrices are given independently. > AFAICT there's no guarantee the magnitude order would be the same as > the position order in the B array of an arbitrary selection of values in > the A vector. Or, at least, that's my understanding of the OP's quest... >
I don't understand. In my command, sort(ib(t)) returns the indexes in ascending order. Nothing to do with "magnitude".