Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Surface geodesics
Replies: 16   Last Post: Jan 23, 2014 7:01 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 €XPOSITO Posts: 9 Registered: 1/19/14
Re: Surface geodesics
Posted: Jan 20, 2014 1:17 AM

You guys are so witty.

On 20/01/2014 06:11, Ross A. Finlayson wrote:
> On 1/19/2014 5:31 PM, William Elliot wrote:
>> On Sun, 19 Jan 2014, ~@XPOSITO wrote:
>>

>>> Let M be a regular affine-connected surface for which the following holds:
>>>
>>> "For every geodesic curve gamma in M, gamma is contained in a plane"
>>>
>>> Can M be said not to be contained in a sphere or a plane?

>>
>> No. Don't double negatives not leave you untied in knots?
>>

>
>
>
> Hmm, here from "untied, in knots", it is that tying the knot
> and untying the knot do not start the same ways, with all
> knots setting from the load line or knot tie line. This is
> with knots starting with loops.
>
> The not and un-, here, the un- is already defined, beyond that
> "double negatives" cancel that it's _what_ they cancel, these
> are obviously such basic facts of the very meaning of things.
> Then, with asking politely in the negative, really it demands
> asking back what of it.
>
> M is a plane.
>

Date Subject Author
1/19/14 €XPOSITO
1/19/14 €XPOSITO
1/19/14 Brian Q. Hutchings
1/19/14 €XPOSITO
1/19/14 William Elliot
1/20/14 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
1/20/14 €XPOSITO
1/21/14 Narasimham
1/20/14 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
1/21/14 Leon Aigret
1/22/14 €XPOSITO
1/20/14 William Elliot
1/20/14 €XPOSITO
1/20/14 William Elliot
1/20/14 €XPOSITO
1/20/14 William Elliot
1/23/14 €XPOSITO