The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Surface geodesics
Replies: 16   Last Post: Jan 23, 2014 7:01 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 9
Registered: 1/19/14
Re: Surface geodesics
Posted: Jan 20, 2014 1:17 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

You guys are so witty.

On 20/01/2014 06:11, Ross A. Finlayson wrote:
> On 1/19/2014 5:31 PM, William Elliot wrote:
>> On Sun, 19 Jan 2014, ~@XPOSITO wrote:

>>> Let M be a regular affine-connected surface for which the following holds:
>>> "For every geodesic curve gamma in M, gamma is contained in a plane"
>>> Can M be said not to be contained in a sphere or a plane?

>> No. Don't double negatives not leave you untied in knots?

> Hmm, here from "untied, in knots", it is that tying the knot
> and untying the knot do not start the same ways, with all
> knots setting from the load line or knot tie line. This is
> with knots starting with loops.
> The not and un-, here, the un- is already defined, beyond that
> "double negatives" cancel that it's _what_ they cancel, these
> are obviously such basic facts of the very meaning of things.
> Then, with asking politely in the negative, really it demands
> asking back what of it.
> M is a plane.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.