The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: The explicate order
Replies: 20   Last Post: Feb 14, 2014 12:58 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Sam Wormley

Posts: 607
Registered: 12/18/09
Re: The explicate order
Posted: Feb 12, 2014 5:50 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 2/12/14, 4:10 PM, Tom Potter wrote:
> "Sam Wormley" <> wrote in message

>> On 2/12/14, 9:00 AM, Tom Potter wrote:
>>> The explicate order!
>> Andrew Blum: Discover the physical side of the internet

> Sammy,
> why do you spam sci.physics
> with articles from popular science articles

I thought this was alt.comp.freeware. Shows you what I know.

> and spam my posts with off topic comments
> such as the one above?
> Are you motivated to kill threads
> that might get some folks to question conventional wisdom
> by inserting stupid off topic posts.
> As Archimedes Plutonium pointed out
> a few years ago, it appears that when
> someone's posts begin to get a little intellectual action,
> you tend to flood sci.physics
> with a batch of your popular science articles
> so that they dominate the newsgroup.
> Have you talked to your shrink about this compulsion?

So you think it's wrong to post teasers to physics articles
in a physics newsgroup. Shows you what I know.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.