Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: The explicate order
Replies: 20   Last Post: Feb 14, 2014 12:58 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
benj

Posts: 3
Registered: 11/11/13
Re: The explicate order
Posted: Feb 13, 2014 7:24 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 02/12/2014 05:10 PM, Tom Potter wrote:
> "Sam Wormley" <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:rcudndbBKeGOVmbPnZ2dnUVZ_vWdnZ2d@giganews.com...

>> On 2/12/14, 9:00 AM, Tom Potter wrote:
>>> The explicate order!
>>
>> Andrew Blum: Discover the physical side of the internet

>>> http://www.ted.com/talks/andrew_blum_what_is_the_internet_really.html
>
> Sammy,
> why do you spam sci.physics
> with articles from popular science articles
>
> and spam my posts with off topic comments
> such as the one above?
>
> Are you motivated to kill threads
> that might get some folks to question conventional wisdom
> by inserting stupid off topic posts.
>
> As Archimedes Plutonium pointed out
> a few years ago, it appears that when
> someone's posts begin to get a little intellectual action,
> you tend to flood sci.physics
> with a batch of your popular science articles
> so that they dominate the newsgroup.
>
> Have you talked to your shrink about this compulsion?


Compulsion? I don't think so Tom. More like paid propaganda.





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.