Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Zero Powers
Replies: 20   Last Post: Feb 14, 2014 2:45 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 K_h Posts: 419 Registered: 4/12/07
Re: Zero Powers
Posted: Feb 13, 2014 5:10 PM

"Shmuel (Seymour J.)Metz" wrote in message
news:52fb9c6c\$3\$fuzhry+tra\$mr2ice@news.patriot.net...

In <F9GdnWm7r-UHAGfPnZ2dnUVZ5tednZ2d@giganews.com>, on 02/11/2014
at 02:00 PM, "K_h" <KHolmes@SX729.com> said:
>
> >Doing a physics problem the other day, the answer came out to be 0^i
>
> That depends on how and whether you define x^y for complex numbers,
> and what you do about the singularity. If you define x^y in terms of
> ln and exp then you need to worry about which branch you define the
> answer in. Be careful to ensure that the definition you use, and the
> path you use, make sense for the physics you're trying to do.

Thanks for the advice. This is a very thorny problem and I appreciate the
help that people have offered. What I was trying to do was to use the math
to make sense of the physics and figure out what domain the exact solution
works for. For a fixed t, the solution seems to work for x>(-1/B) and I was
really only concerned about the case at -1/B. If the -1/B case is a
singularity or undefined than that is the answer I was looking for. I just
wanted input from sci.math because various internet searches didn't yield
anything about o^i being an indeterminate form.

thx

Date Subject Author
2/11/14 K_h
2/11/14 William Elliot
2/12/14 K_h
2/12/14 William Elliot
2/12/14 Peter Percival
2/12/14 Roland Franzius
2/12/14 Bart Goddard
2/12/14 Roland Franzius
2/13/14 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
2/12/14 K_h
2/13/14 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
2/13/14 Roland Franzius
2/13/14 K_h
2/13/14 Roland Franzius
2/14/14 K_h
2/14/14 Roland Franzius
2/12/14 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
2/13/14 K_h
2/13/14 quasi
2/14/14 K_h
2/12/14 Dr J R Stockton