In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, David Bernier <email@example.com> wrote:
> .... > With respect to Archimedes of Syracuse, > since he discovered the law of floating, partially submerged > and completely submerged uniform-density "bodies" that > goes by the name of Archimedes's Principle, > I've been wondering why he doesn't seem to be called > mathematical physicist or just plain theoretical physicist.
Surely he was. (Remember his theory of levers, and his calculations of centres of gravity.) But he was also an outstanding pure mathematician. For example, Riemann sums just express in modern notation the way that Archimedes handled integrals. If you read Archimedes, you won't always find it easy, but you will realize that you are in the presence of an impeccable mathematician.
> > Or I guess I'm intrigued by why they say Galileo started physics ....
I don't know who "they" are. Text-book authors often make simplistic remarks like that in historical footnotes, which are uncritically copied from one book to another. In fact most areas of thought seem to have built up gradually through the work of many people.