John Gabriel <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in news:email@example.com:
> On Sunday, 23 February 2014 15:30:52 UTC+2, Moron-Of-Oz wrote: >> >> Surely saying all rooms are occupied >> >> is equivalent to Saying there is no room that is unoccupied >> >> In either case, there would be no need for a 'last room'. > > There is no surely in mathematics you fucking moron.
> Surely, does not > constitute proof.
I didn't posit it as a proof, it is simple a statement of fact.
> Making an assumption all rooms are occupied does not > mean it is true.
It is when you are specifying the scenario.
>> He who? >> It depends on whether there are enough guests for each room. > > Ha, ha! You monkey!
I guess that means you agree
>> If there is a one-to-one mapping of guests to rooms, then it IS the >> case that all the rooms are occupied. > > You can say nothing at any time about "all the rooms".
Yes you can.
> You can talk > about n rooms. Not all the rooms.
We are both talking about all the rooms. Its easy .. I'll do it again: all the rooms are occupied. See .. I talked (virtually) about it
We use the upside-down A symbol in mathematic notation to talk about all of something. Perhaps you're unfamiliar with it, as it isn't usually taught in primary school
>> > No last room => all rooms not occupied. >> No .. it doesn't imply that at all. > > Yes, it does imply that.
Not at all.
> It's a fucked up argument by a moron > (Hilbert) and his moron followers - YOU!
Let's say room 1 is occupied. There is no last room. You now say that means all rooms are not occupied. So room 1 is not occupied. Contradiction. Your implication is refuted
>> Why would all of the room be unoccupied? Or did you mean to say 'not >> all rooms occupied'? In which case it depends on the set of guests. > > OMG: You are infinitely stupid.
Not at all, its just that what your wrote was so obviously wrong that I thought you may have made a mistake.
Clearly you're just a moron. . >> If there is no unoccupied room (the hotel is 'full') then there IS a >> one-to-one mapping of guests to rooms. Both sets are 'infinite'. > >> I didn't say that at all. If you're going to criticise, as least >> criticise what I said, and not your own inventions of what you >> imagine I said. > > You said it moron.
Said what? You dishonestly snipped what it was you claimed I said.
You're embarrased by yet another mistake on your part.
Why do you bother? Every time you post you prove you don't belong here with honest mathematicians. You're a fraud and a liar.
> In fact, half the time trolls like you don't know > what they are saying. You are a troll. Everyone on this forum knows > you are a nobody. I am real. My name is John Gabriel. What's your real > name troll?
None of your business, moron. I don't tell pyshcopathic nutjobs like you what my name is.