Am 24.02.2014 12:23, schrieb Wizard-Of-Oz: > John Gabriel <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in > news:email@example.com: > >> On Monday, 24 February 2014 07:32:58 UTC+2, Wizard-Of-Oz wrote: >> >> Troll: That is a very poor definition of 'occupied already' >> >> JG: As you can see, that is a typical troll statement: He claims it is >> a very poor definition but does NOT say why and offers no alternative. >> He has spammed my thread continuously with such fine "mathematics". > > It is poor because it is eaily refuted. Room 0 can be empty and all > rooms after full, and the defintiion will fail. > > Better would at least be that the hotel is fully occupied if for all > rooms r, room r is occupied
Makes no WM-difference whatsoever if all rooms with unknown prime room numbers are unoccupied.