Roland Franzius <email@example.com> wrote in news:lefav4$evu$1 @newsserver.rrzn.uni-hannover.de:
> Am 24.02.2014 12:23, schrieb Wizard-Of-Oz: >> John Gabriel <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in >> news:email@example.com: >> >>> On Monday, 24 February 2014 07:32:58 UTC+2, Wizard-Of-Oz wrote: >>> >>> Troll: That is a very poor definition of 'occupied already' >>> >>> JG: As you can see, that is a typical troll statement: He claims it is >>> a very poor definition but does NOT say why and offers no alternative. >>> He has spammed my thread continuously with such fine "mathematics". >> >> It is poor because it is eaily refuted. Room 0 can be empty and all >> rooms after full, and the defintiion will fail. >> >> Better would at least be that the hotel is fully occupied if for all >> rooms r, room r is occupied > > Makes no WM-difference whatsoever if all rooms with unknown prime room > numbers are unoccupied.
Your comment doesn't seem relevant or sensible. Are you making fun of someone else here with the "WM-difference" and "unknown primes" ??