
Re: How to instantly spot a troll.
Posted:
Feb 24, 2014 7:58 AM


John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> wrote in news:d49de3eb11bf4993869da9772e8d726c@googlegroups.com:
> On Monday, 24 February 2014 14:12:18 UTC+2, WizardOfOz wrote: >> John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> wrote in >> >> news:6a1fe5c86d554d63bcc385ee9b73ab0e@googlegroups.com: >> >> >> >> > On Monday, 24 February 2014 13:23:41 UTC+2, WizardOfOz wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Troll: It is poor because it is eaily refuted. Room 0 can be empty >> >> > and all rooms after full, and the defintiion will fail. >> >> > >> >> > JG: That's not what his definition said. Here it is again because >> >> > trolls don't even try to comprehend what they read: >> >> > >> >> > If, for all n, room n+1 is occupied already, the hotel is just full >> >> > and no more guests can be accommodated. >> >> >> >> If we assume numbers starting from 0, then the hotel is 'just full' >> even >> >> it room 0 is empty >> >> >> >> Try to think here >> >> >> >> > Julio does not mean that any of the rooms before n+1 are empty. >> >> >> >> But they can be .. his definition does not preclude that. A hotel >> where >> >> there is an empty room can hardly be described sensibly as full, yet >> his >> >> definition allows for that. >> >> >> >> That makes it a poor definition >> >> >> >> > But >> >> > the local troll misinterpreted just as he misinterprets the most >> > basic >> >> > statements. >> >> >> >> No misinterpretation by me. >> >> >> >> > Troll: Better would at least be that the hotel is fully occupied >> > if >> >> > for all rooms r, room r is occupied >> >> > >> >> > It is poor for the same reason <snip> more crappola >> >> > >> >> > JG: Troll forgot that he said: "Better would at least be that the >> >> > hotel is fully occupied if for all rooms r, room r is occupied" >> >> >> >> Why would I forget my improvment on his defintion? >> >> >> >> > This is hilarious. It just keeps getting better! Ha, ha! >> >> >> >> I take it you're laughing at yourself >> >> >> >> > Troll: No .. I was simply acknowledging that he is right that you >> >> > cannot have things he defined being true >> >> > >> >> > JG: He is so confused at this stage, that he no longer knows >> > whether >> >> > his opponent is correct or not. :) >> >> >> >> Why do you think Julio is my opponent? >> >> >> >> And no, I am not confused at all. Though you do show that you cannot >> >> comprehend what is being said. >> >> >> >> > Troll: There is nothing to refute, it is simply a poor definition >> >> > >> >> > JG: Troll fails to realise that deductions based on poor >> > definitions >> >> > will end up being refuted. Troll actually misses the entire point >> > of >> >> > that paragraph. >> >> >> >> If he had made any deductions worth refuting. >> >> >> >> > Troll: I guess the truth does that to trolls like you >> >> > >> >> > JG: Poor troll thinks that's a "refutation" of sorts. Too funny! >> >> >> >> No .. its just pointing out that you are a troll, and the truth >> >> aggitates trolls like you >> >> >> >> > Troll: And yes, every guest can be accomodated that way >> >> > >> >> > JG: Troll cannot distinguish between assertion and fact. Troll has >> > no >> >> > idea what constitutes an argument. >> >> >> >> Poor trool JG thinks that's a refutation. >> >> >> >> > Troll: Spelling is irrelevant >> >> > >> >> > JG: All trolls think that spelling is not longer important. >> >> >> >> It isn't >> >> >> >> > Troll: You really have problem reading. The point is that every >> > guest >> >> > can be accomodated AND there are still gaps between rooms >> >> > >> >> > JG: Troll repeats his incorrect assertions and fancies that he has >> > put >> >> > forth yet another blockbuster argument! :) >> >> >> >> My assertion is correct. >> >> >> >> I showed the mapping. >> >> >> >> It maps each guest to a unique room >> >> >> >> And it leaves rooms unoccupied >> >> >> >> Therefore my claim is correct >> >> >> >> And further I am pointing out that you misrepresented what I had >> said. >> >> >> >> > Troll: Moron >> >> > >> >> > JG: Troll decides to insult as he has run out of little "gems" >> > known >> >> > as platitudes. >> >> >> >> Just following your lead >> >> >> >> > Troll: Yes. that's what I meant >> >> > >> >> > JG: So troll writes things he does not mean and expects others to >> > know >> >> > what he means. Hilarious! >> >> >> >> Clearly you DID know what I meant. >> >> >> >> > Troll: They are what you lack. >> >> > >> >> > JG: Yet another nonrefutation. >> >> >> >> It wasn't a refutation, it was an insult >> >> >> >> > Troll: You also lack an ability to comprehend. >> >> > >> >> > JG: Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. If only trolls >> > knew >> >> > that! Ha, ha! >> >> > >> >> > Troll: How sad, little troll. >> >> > >> >> > JG: And for good measure, another insult. Hee, hee! >> >> >> >> You deserve more insults than there is room to post. Ono would need >> an >> >> infinite hotel to accomodate them all. >> >> >> >> So .. you've said NOTHING AT ALL to refute any of what I was saying. >> >> You only posted insults and nothing more >> >> >> >> Typical troll behaviour > > Another gigantic bowel movement containing no math, no arguments and > nothing remotely resembling logic. Tsk, tsk.
Clearly you didn't read what I wrote. It is no surprise that you would make criticism without reading or understanding what was written. Trolls like you do that sort of thing.

