"John Gabriel" <email@example.com> wrote in message news:firstname.lastname@example.org... > On Monday, 24 February 2014 08:46:42 UTC+2, Julio Di Egidio wrote: >> "John Gabriel" <email@example.com> wrote in message >> news:firstname.lastname@example.org... >> >> > The Xeno paradox is not a paradox at all. It is an exercise in wrong >> > thinking which I have disproved at the STATU (Space time and the >> > universe) >> > forum. I am not about to do it here again. >> >> I have no time now to go through the various replies. In the meantime, >> could you share a link to that post of yours: I am interested. > > See page 25 of the article at: > > https://www.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8b6b6a8a596275a7a7a9 > > However, there are over 2500 comments at the following link: > > http://www.spacetimeandtheuniverse.com/math/4507-0-999-equal-one-116.html > > While a Search function exists, it does not work that well. I have > commented on many other topics besides the 0.999 debate. > > I recall at least three comments where I thoroughly debunk the Xeno (non) > paradox with actual examples. Sorry, but you have to search for these > yourself. I have very low-bandwidth and pay for a fixed amount of > gigabytes. > > One of the contributors (Grapes) was involved in the debate concerning > Xeno's paradox.
I'll see what I can gather, although as you had anticipated, the search function is broken, so it's gonna be pretty difficult... Yet, that Achilles reaches the tortoise at some point is a fact: so, whichever your specific answer, I'd expect you do have an answer to the (mathematical) question "where is that?"