In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Dan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> If you want to claim that there are no infinite sets, you might have a point. > For every Dedekind-infinite set S, however, there exists a subset of S which > satisfy Peano's axioms -- a "copy" of the natural numbers, if you will. And > that's no "juvenile rot".
What about sets being infinite but not Dedekind-infinite? --