On 2/26/2014 4:27 PM, Dan Christensen wrote: > On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 4:31:24 PM UTC-5, Virgil wrote: >> In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, >> Dan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> wrote: >>> If you want to claim that there are no infinite sets, you might have a point. >>> For every Dedekind-infinite set S, however, there exists a subset of S which >>> satisfy Peano's axioms -- a "copy" of the natural numbers, if you will. And >>> that's no "juvenile rot".
>> What about sets being infinite but not Dedekind-infinite?
> Can you give an example?
You were told on math.stackexchange that you can't be given an explicit example. You were even told why. Why are you asking for an example here?