John Gabriel <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in news:email@example.com:
> On Friday, 28 February 2014 01:53:27 UTC+2, Wizard-Of-Oz wrote: > >> > 1. The difference (or subtraction) of two numbers is that number >> > which describes how much the larger exceeds the smaller. > >> So 2 - 3 = 1 > > Beep!! 2 < 3. Moron! Beep! Beep!
I know that, moron.
Your axiom says 2 - 3 = 1 ro subtract 3 from 2 you determine how must the larger (3) exceeds the smaller (2)
2 - 3 = 1
>> > 3. The sum (or addition) of two numbers is that number whose >> > difference with either of the two numbers is either of the two >> > numbers. >> Two numbers .. 2 and 3 >> I need only cosider either one or the other of those (the axiom does >> not Lets choose 3 >> 6 - 3 = 3 >> That result is one of the numbers >> So 3 + 2 = 6 > > Beep! The difference of 6 and 2 is 4 which is not one of the numbers. > Beep! Moron!!!
Your axion doesn't say that you need to consider 2 at all
Your axiom says I only need to look at either of the number, not both.
Your axiom doesn't say that the difference is the other number, it just has to be one of either of them
Your axiom says 3 + 2 = 6
>> > 4. The quotient (or division) of two numbers is that number that >> > measures either number in terms of the other. >> So 2 / 6 = 3 > > Huh???? You sure of that? "That number" is 1/3. Moron!! Beep! Beep!
Your axiom measures either number (say 6) in terms of the other (2), giveing 3.
Your axiom says 2 / 6 = 3
>> > 5. If a unit is divided by a number into parts, then each of these >> > parts of a unit, is called the reciprocal of that number. > >> Lets divide the unit, 1, into 3 parts: 1/8 3/8 1/2 > > Beep!!!! Into "equal parts". Beep!! Moron!!
Your axiom doesn't say equal parts. Like the other axioms it is sloppy and ambiguous. You should have read what you wrote before you posted it. Perhaps your mind just doesn't allow you to do things like that, or to see what it is that your axiom logically say.
> Unbelievably stupid man!!!!
Yes you are .. you post sloppily written ambiguous axioms. You are unbelievably stupid