Dan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> wrote in news:firstname.lastname@example.org:
> On Friday, February 28, 2014 5:47:25 AM UTC-5, Wizard-Of-Oz wrote: >> John Gabriel <email@example.com> wrote in >> >> news:firstname.lastname@example.org: >> >> >> >> > On Friday, 28 February 2014 06:40:29 UTC+2, Dan Christensen wrote: >> >> >> Now you are changing your axiom. A good first step, but don't stop >> >> >> there. >> >> > >> >> > Bullshit!!! Any astute mind would have realised that this is what I >> >> > meant. > > Formal systems are like computers: Garbage in, garbage out. No > hand-waving allowed. You really must be more careful with these > "axioms" of yours, John.
<SARCASM>But john is the greatest intelligence in the world, it is inconceivable that he made a mistake; so there is no need for him to be careful as everything he writes is perfect like the word of God.</SARCASM]>
He really just doesn't understand how axioms work .. that they need to be wored so they say what exactly is wanted AND NOTHING MORE. That they are satified by what he wants is only half the work .. the other half is making sure than nothing that he wants to be invalid (like 2 + 3 = 6) satisfies the axioms. He's only done half the job. And his ego is too over-inflated to see that he hasn't done it perfectly.