On Saturday, 1 March 2014 20:47:36 UTC+2, Dan Christensen wrote: > On Saturday, March 1, 2014 1:31:57 PM UTC-5, John Gabriel wrote:
> If you are claiming that number theory can be derived from your "axioms" alone (apart from those of logic and set theory), then it does indeed need a proof.
I am not only claiming, but I have shown that number theory can be derived using Euclid's (modified) Elements - call them my axioms if you want. Axioms don't need proofs. In fact, they usually can't be proved.
>Have you been able to prove ANYTHING from this gobbledygook?
Peano's rot? Of course not. Even Peano could not do much with it. :-) Peano's "axioms" are at most a juvenile attempt at defining arithmetic and set operations. Only primates might fall into that trap. I am far more evolved than all of you.