On Wednesday, 5 March 2014 07:41:16 UTC+2, Dan Christensen wrote: > On Wednesday, March 5, 2014 12:12:34 AM UTC-5, John Gabriel wrote: > > > On Wednesday, 5 March 2014 06:48:27 UTC+2, Dan Christensen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > <snip> a lot of crap hardly worth repeating or addressing again. > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you could find your way to admitting, say, the number 1, you could start generating numbers like crazy. > > > > > > > > > > > > The UNIT is the number 1. > > > > An EXCELLENT start, John Gabriel! Add that to your axioms. That would be equivalent to Peano's 1st axiom. > > > > Now, let's see that 2nd axiom again.... > > > > > > > And the beauty of my axioms is that I actually show how the UNIT is derived. :-) > > > > In the eye of the beholder, I guess. > > > > It's too bad about all those ill-defined operators, but every journey begins with a single step as they say! Now, now, old chap... Stiff upper lip! > > > > Dan > > Download my DC Proof 2.0 software at http://www.dcproof.com > > Visit my new math blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com
Anyone who has studied Euclid will immediately realise you are a fool. :-)
