On Thursday, March 6, 2014 10:37:51 PM UTC-6, swtch...@gmail.com wrote: > Thank you for such a thorough and detailed explanation. > > I regret to say that I am not astute enough on the subject > > matter to render the messages comprehensible to me. > > I think I'm more comfortable with concrete examples using > > colors. > > However, what I'm hesitant on is now that the blueprint for > > the basic pattern for the theorem seems to have been deteremined,
The theorem is **NOT** about "patterns". The theorem does **NOT** say that there is an algorithm for producing a coloring, as you seem to think. The theorem says that **GIVEN** a map, a coloring exists *for that map*.
> I don't want that to be yet another plateau that offers a glimpse > > of hope only to realize that there are still bigger hurdles to > > consider before the next plateau may be had.
One way to avoid this is to actually learn what the problem *states* instead of guessing (incorrectly).