Peter Percival wrote: > email@example.com wrote: >> That's a very good point, thank you. > > Does anyone know what "very good point" you're referring to? All your > replies are replies to stumblin' in's first post. Why don't you reply > to the relevant post? > > What you are doing is analogous to this: two people, let's call them > "Sw" ad "St" are part of a group of about ten people. St starts a > conversation and the other nine-or-so contribute. Each person, as they > contribute, looks at the person he or she is replying to. Each person, > that is, except Sw, who always looks at St no matter which member of the > group he's replying to.
It gets worse: Sw is St. Ignore my second paragraph. The first still stands.
-- Madam Life's a piece in bloom, Death goes dogging everywhere: She's the tenant of the room, He's the ruffian on the stair.