The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Infinity: The Story So Far
Replies: 7   Last Post: Mar 9, 2014 8:52 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 8,833
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Infinity: The Story So Far
Posted: Mar 7, 2014 4:01 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <>, wrote:

> A proof is necessary for Peano's axioms because "successor" does not mean
> "different successor", it does not even mean number.

> >

Is WM claiming that the Peano axioms to not require a successor to be
different from that of which it is a successor?

Or require that successors of different members are not themselves

Then WM's version of those Peano axioms must then be quite different
from any standard English versions which explicitely require both.

And it is the Peano axioms that justify induction, and merely require,
in addition, a couple of simple definitions to produce the natural
numbers with their standard arithmetic.

That WM apparently cannot see this is a measure of how piss poor his
mathematical vision is,

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.