The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.symbolic

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: first anniversary of the IITS
Replies: 21   Last Post: Jan 10, 2015 4:01 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Albert D. Rich

Posts: 311
From: Hawaii Island
Registered: 5/30/09
Re: first anniversary of the IITS
Posted: Mar 22, 2014 4:27 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Friday, March 21, 2014 8:42:15 AM UTC-10, wrote:

> [...]
> Just cosmetic defects are left to report in the Chapter 5 evaluations:
> in Example 100, different versions of the radicand are employed in
> parallel. And COS(2*x) could be used to advantage in the evaluations of
> Examples 93-94, 96 and 117. A systematic check against the evaluations
> in Timofeev's book, however, remains to be made.

I revised the optimal antiderivatives for examples 93, 94, 96, 100 and 117 of Chapter 5 of the Timofeev integration test suite as you suggested, and posted the results on the Rubi website at

Please explain what is required for "A systematic check against the evaluations in Timofeev's book".


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.