Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Two Finite Arithmetics
Replies: 19   Last Post: Apr 9, 2014 9:27 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Dan Christensen

Posts: 5,462
Registered: 7/9/08
Re: Two Finite Arithmetics
Posted: Apr 8, 2014 11:57 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Tuesday, April 8, 2014 11:47:13 PM UTC-4, William Elliot wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Apr 2014, Dan Christensen wrote:

> > > > > Naive Finite Arithmetic
> > > > > Let N be a set, 0,m two elements and S|N -> N a function.
> > > > > Axioms for naive finite arithmetic:
> > > > > 0, m in N; Sm = m
> > > > m should have no successor. Perhaps a partial function S on N?
> > > Naive finite arithmetic is not your finite arithmetic.
> > > S is a full function to banish the pests of your system.
> > Inventing a successor for the maximum number seems a bit weird to me.
> It fits much better than not having one.

We have a finite succession of objects with a beginning and an end. The first element, by definition has no predecessor. The last element, by definition has no successor. I'd say your work-around isn't up to spec.

Download my DC Proof 2.0 software at http://www.dcproof.com
Visit my new math blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2015. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.