> >I think that teachers who aren't comfortable with > that discussion would be less interested in this > approach. > > So are you saying then that the actual math content > is *assumed* to be covered by the teacher, and that > the blog focuses on other issues? > > Bob Hansen continually points out that the blog has > no math content, and he appears generally (or at > least often) to be correct. But perhaps that not > really what the dy/dan blog is for. Is it all a > misunderstanding? > > Cheers, > Joe N
For me, the blog is for pedagogy. I get math teaching ideas.
I know the blog is very popular; I assume others might use it for other reasons.