In article <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 17:32:09 UTC+2, Virgil wrote: > > In article <email@example.com>, > > > > firstname.lastname@example.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > Couldn't just the seemingly so fruitful hypothesis of the infinite have > > > straightly inserted contradictions into mathematics and have > > > fundamentally > > > distroyed the basic nature of this science which is so proud on its > > > consistency? > > > > > Mathematics is not a science at all, > > Mathematical sciences is a broad term that includes, in addition to areas of > mathematics, those academic disciplines that are primarily mathematical in > nature ... (Wikipedia).
That many sciences are largely dependent on mathematics does not show that mathematics is in any way dependent of them for ITS truths > > > since its truths are established > > as the logical consequences of axioms rather than by physical experiment. > > > Try to draw any logical conclusion without physics
How about Not ( P and Q) <==> (Not P) or (Not Q) or for real numbers, x,y and z, most of which do not even exist in WM's physics, x*(y+z) = (x*y) + (x*z) --