On Sunday, May 4, 2014 4:50:29 AM UTC-4, muec...@rz.fh-augsburg.de wrote:
> > So, you cannot neither point out any faulty assumption or inferences in the proof, nor can you formally disprove the result. Thought so. > > > > Unfortunately you are not informed about the state of the art (even that of 50 years ago) to discuss this topic.
You must learn that, in mathematics, it is not enough simply to make wild assertions. These days, on any foundational issues, a formal proof is necessary -- one line, one rule, as Virgil put it. You will have no credibility until you do, WM.