In article <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> > Does WM then claim that one can be ruled by rules that have not been and > > cannot be stated explicitly? > > I am asking whether this rule has been made explicit. There are opinions > stating that everything has to be made explicit, otherwise it cannot be > accepted.
It is mere common sense.
How can one sensibly be REQUIRED to obey a rule unless it is explicitly stated?
At least outside of WMytheology?
Note that while WM seems to require conformity to all sorts of unstated rules in his wild weird world of WMytheology, no one else regards his wild weird world of WMytheology as at all sensible. --