The Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Professional Associations » nyshsmath

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: trapezoid clarification
Replies: 55   Last Post: Apr 24, 2017 2:30 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
GPJ

Posts: 56
From: Broome County
Registered: 10/3/11
Re: trapezoid clarification
Posted: May 17, 2014 4:05 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply
att1.html (9.1 K)
image.png (59.5 K)
image.jpeg (136.0 K)

Here's the chart.
[image.png]
I thought there was a trapezoid thread earlier, the geometry standards clarification document has it there. It should be released soon.

[image.jpeg]

I think Euclid defined Trapezoia as "all other quads". I tweeted the above image with the hope the end of the trapezoid wars was near. I remain neutral on inclusive or exclusive superiority, but would always appreciate our continued request for releasing a CCLS glossary to help us with precise language.
Sorry for my brevity ( and imprecision) it's a cool yet beautiful day to be outside.


~Gene Jordan

Broome County AMTNYS chair (Southern Tier)


On May 17, 2014, at 8:35 AM, "Meg Clemens" <mclemens@twcny.rr.com<mailto:mclemens@twcny.rr.com>> wrote:

At training in Albany this past week, NYSED released a standards clarification document for Geometry that states (among other items) that a trapezoid is now defined with the ?inclusion? definition: a trapezoid has at least one pair of parallel sides. Although this might be a surprise to NYS teachers who have used the exclusive definition, this is a common definition for trapezoid.

Three questions:


1. Is this standards clarification memo posted on engageny anywhere yet? I couldn?t find it.



2. How do we treat conflicting definitions next year when we are preparing students for both regents?


3. With the new definition, what is an isosceles trapezoid? I think we need clarification on this.


a. If I use trapezoid w/ one pair of opposite sides congruent, then a parallelogram is an isosceles trapezoid but its base angles are not congruent.

b. If I use trapezoid w/ one pair of opposite sides congruent and base angles are congruent, then rectangles and squares are isosceles trapezoids, which might be OK.

c. There is an alternative definition that uses one axis of symmetry and one w/ no symmetry to yield the usual depiction of an isosceles trapezoid.


Meg Clemens
Canton Central School


Date Subject Author
5/17/14
Read trapezoid clarification
Meg Clemens
5/17/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
Jonathan Halabi
5/17/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
Eleanor Pupko
5/17/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
ElizWaite@aol.com
5/17/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
Jonathan Halabi
5/17/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
sherry
5/17/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
Roberta M. Eisenberg
5/17/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
Jonathan Halabi
5/17/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
JFish@csufsd.org
5/19/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
Tom Kenyon
5/19/14
Read RE: trapezoid clarification
Dianne Gizowski
5/17/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
GPJ
5/17/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
Jonathan Halabi
5/17/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
JFish@csufsd.org
5/18/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
michelle Van Etten
5/18/14
Read RE: trapezoid clarification
barrpub
5/18/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
Roberta M. Eisenberg
5/18/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
Kathy
5/19/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
Roberta M. Eisenberg
5/19/14
Read RE: trapezoid clarification
Elaine Zseller
5/18/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
Roberta M. Eisenberg
5/21/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
Joan Rogers-Harrington
5/25/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
Jennifer Sauer
5/27/14
Read RE: trapezoid clarification
Elaine Zseller
5/27/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
gWilkie@highlands.com
5/28/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
Bruce Waldner
5/28/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
L.C.
5/28/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
Jonathan Halabi
5/28/14
Read RE: trapezoid clarification
GPJ
6/3/14
Read RE: trapezoid clarification
Elaine Zseller
6/3/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
Roberta M. Eisenberg
6/5/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
gWilkie@highlands.com
6/16/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
Virginia Kuryla
6/17/14
Read RE: trapezoid clarification
Elaine Zseller
6/18/14
Read Algebra 2 Trig Regents
Thompson, Patricia
6/18/14
Read RE: Algebra 2 Trig Regents
Kevin Connolly
6/18/14
Read Re: Algebra 2 Trig Regents
Denise C. Pusateri
6/18/14
Read Re: Algebra 2 Trig Regents
Betty Worthington
6/18/14
Read Re: Algebra 2 Trig Regents
Daniel Knaisch
6/18/14
Read Re: Algebra 2 Trig Regents
Cheryl Novick
6/20/14
Read Re: Algebra 2 Trig Regents
Kelly Stone
6/20/14
Read Re: Algebra 2 Trig Regents
Ann Murray
6/20/14
Read Re: Algebra 2 Trig Regents
Daniel Knaisch
6/20/14
Read RE: Algebra 2 Trig Regents
Holly Brightman
4/24/17
Read Statistics Algebra 2
Thompson, Patricia
4/24/17
Read Re: Statistics Algebra 2
Bob Bieringer
6/3/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
Jonathan Halabi
6/4/14
Read Heads up - cheating
Tom Kenyon
6/4/14
Read RE: Heads up - cheating
Cooney, Amanda
6/4/14
Read Re: Heads up - cheating
StGOLD2112@aol.com
6/4/14
Read Re: Heads up - cheating
Morse, Dana
6/4/14
Read Re: Heads up - cheating
Kathy
5/28/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
Virginia Kuryla
6/2/14
Read RE: trapezoid clarification
Elaine Zseller
5/29/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
Art Kalish
6/4/14
Read Re: trapezoid clarification
CCSSIMath

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.