"The Starmaker" <email@example.com> wrote in message news:firstname.lastname@example.org > William December Starr wrote: > > > > In article <F9qhv.1366102$Oa6.email@example.com>, > > benj <firstname.lastname@example.org> said: > > > > > CO2 is clearly wrong, but as for climate disruption being man-made > > > that is another issue. There are LOTS of other credible candidates > > > there. Including, CFCs, Space shuttle chemicals, air pollution > > > (not CO2), the hydrogen bombs set off in space creating new > > > radiation belts, HAARP, and God knows what other classified > > > projects. Weather modification for use in warfare has LONG been > > > under development. No doubt it's coming along quite nicely now. > > > > Yes, they've reached the point that it's only thirty years away. > > > > -- wds > > > > That is another fallacy you get from these people... > > > The solution is just a few years away...
Actually it's already here as of the 40s & 50s. Remember the cloud seeding experiments?
I figure micro-meteorites (showers) would provide good condensation seeds for water mollecules in the air. Obviously you need water in the air, but passing through micro-meteor shower might kick them off.
Have you ever wondered why the study of weather is called meterology?