In article <but4v8Fmd4oU1@mid.individual.net>, email@example.com says... > > Am 30.05.2014 02:36, schrieb R Kym Horsell: > > Oh, sure. 1-2 mm/yr c1900, 2-3 mm/yr c2000 -- It's starting to compare > > favourably to the last time the ice sheets melted. > > > > www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/12/101201120605.htm > > 4 Dec 2010 ... Southampton researchers have estimated that sea-level rose by an average of > > about 1 metre per century at the end of the last Ice Age, ... > > > E.g. this article: > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/05/140528133151.htm > > Quote: > "A new study has found that the Antarctic Ice Sheet began melting about > 5,000 years earlier than previously thought coming out of the last ice > age -- and that shrinkage of the vast ice sheet accelerated during eight > distinct episodes, causing rapid sea level rise." > > How can they call this 'science'? > > The Antarctic is NOT melting AT ALL! > > The average temperatures are well below melting point of water, so there > is little chance for ice to melt. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_of_Antarctica > > Icebergs are already floating, hence have no influence on the sea-levels.
The Antartic ice sheet does not become "ice bergs" until the glaciers calve into the sea. And the ice sheet during the glacial maximum was larger than it is now.
While some skepticism about the IPCC model, which is based on 0.3 percent of a glaciation cycle, is reasonable, to deny the glaciation cycle is either ignorant or crazy.