Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: The paradox of Tristram Shandy simplified and made intelligible
Replies: 6   Last Post: Jun 7, 2014 4:24 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Ben Bacarisse

Posts: 1,237
Registered: 7/4/07
Re: The paradox of Tristram Shandy simplified and made intelligible
Posted: Jun 6, 2014 4:22 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> writes:
<snip>
> Do you think that Duck returns all numbers?

For all n, there exists m s.t. n not in s_i for all i > m. You may
interpret that how you like.

> Do you think that all rationals are enumerated?

I know that there is an enumeration of the rationals.

See my other recent post about interpretations. I've written a short
note with my explanation of your paradox.

<snip>
--
Ben.



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.