In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, John Gabriel <email@example.com> wrote: > On Thursday, 19 June 2014 20:39:31 UTC+2, Virgil wrote: > > In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, > > John Gabriel <email@example.com> wrote: > > > On Thursday, June 19, 2014 6:55:55 PM UTC+2, Dirk Van de moortel wrote: > > > > John Gabriel <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > > > > On Thursday, 19 June 2014 16:20:50 UTC+2, Dirk Van de moortel wrote: > > > > >> John Gabriel <email@example.com> wrote: > > > > > Suggest you post your question on another thread. I played epsilonics > > > > > with you before. It's boring. > > JG claim its boring because JG can't get it to come out his way. > > > > Here or nowhere, coward. > > > You will not have it your way. > > John Gabriel demands having every thing his way, here but his "New > > Calculus" will get old and be forgotten without ever being used by > > anyone other than John Gabriel for anything but a bad example. > Too late for that. :-) The NC is being used by many around the globe.
> There > are many very useful features in NC
Name one that isn't better handled by proper calculus! So far every such claim by JG has been disproved to the satisfaction of everyone other than JG himself. --