Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.



*** CRANK ALERT ***
Posted:
Jun 20, 2014 11:29 AM


Using his Wacky New Number Theory, John Gabriel is unable to formally prove that 2+2=4. (You need Peano's axioms for that. And John Gabriel just HATES Peano's axioms.)
In John Gabriel's Wacky New Calculus, his definition of a derivative doesn't work for y=x^3. His klugey work around? Make the derivative undefined at x=0!!!



