Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: *** CRANK ALERT ***
Replies: 23   Last Post: Jul 10, 2014 10:00 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Brian Q. Hutchings

Posts: 6,087
Registered: 12/6/04
wTf is new about THAT
Posted: Jul 6, 2014 2:15 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

that is kind of cute, but I don't see that it
is not strictly isomorphic with a)
Euclid's usage, and b)
the standard, modern usage

> A unit is the result of a ratio where the magnitudes are equal, that is, x:x, y:y, u:u, etc.
>
>
>
> This was a quantum leap in the development of number. From the abstraction of the unit, one now has a standard of measurement. Having established the unit, quantitative trichotomy is now possible. For example, if any two magnitudes are composed of units (or multiples of units), then it is possible to tell the difference in terms of units. Think of this with relation to the ratio of magnitudes where it is only possible to tell if equal, greater or smaller, BUT NOT by how much greater or smaller.
>
>
>
> The stage was now set for the final step. What to do if a magnitude is a measurable part of a unit?
>
>
>
> This led to the establishment of the fraction - a ratio of natural numbers where natural numbers are composed of units.
>
>
>
> The anti-climax became manifest when ancient mathematicians discovered that certain magnitudes refused to be measured in units or parts of a unit. These were called the incommensurable magnitudes.
>
>
>
> If you were able to comprehend this comment in its entirety, then you already know more than all the mathematics professors combined with regards to number. In fact, you will have understood and learned more than you did in all your school years.
>
>
>
> To learn more and increase your knowledge of mathematics, I recommend you study my New Calculus - the first and only rigorous formulation of calculus in human history. http://thenewcalculus.weebly.com
>
>
>
>
>
> Comments are NOT welcome. This comment is produced in the interests of public education; and to eradicate ignorance and stupidity from mainstream mathematics.



Date Subject Author
7/6/14
Read *** CRANK ALERT ***
Dan Christensen
7/6/14
Read wTf is new about THAT
Brian Q. Hutchings
7/6/14
Read Re: 1.93 - Did anyone understand what Euclid had to say about number
before John Gabriel?
Tim Golden BandTech.com
7/6/14
Read he just hates shakESpear, and I'm just hiding behind the grammrian(s
Brian Q. Hutchings
7/6/14
Read Re: 1.93 - Did anyone understand what Euclid had to say about number before John Gabriel?
Casual Observer
7/7/14
Read Re: 1.93 - Did anyone understand what Euclid had to say about number before John Gabriel?
Casual Observer
7/7/14
Read Re: 1.93 - Did anyone understand what Euclid had to say about number before John Gabriel?
Casual Observer
7/7/14
Read Re: 1.93 - Did anyone understand what Euclid had to say about number before John Gabriel?
Casual Observer
7/7/14
Read Re: 1.93 - Did anyone understand what Euclid had to say about number before John Gabriel?
Casual Observer
7/6/14
Read Re: 1.93 - Did anyone understand what Euclid had to say about number before John Gabriel?
SPQR
7/7/14
Read Re: 1.93 - Did anyone understand what Euclid had to say about number before John Gabriel?
PianoMan
7/7/14
Read Re: 1.93 - Did anyone understand what Euclid had to say about number before John Gabriel?
Casual Observer
7/7/14
Read raNOUtoFAbAr
Brian Q. Hutchings
7/8/14
Read Re: 1.93 - Did anyone understand what Euclid had to say about number
before John Gabriel?
John Gabriel
7/8/14
Read Re: 1.93 - Did anyone understand what Euclid had to say about number
before John Gabriel?
Dan Christensen
7/8/14
Read Re: 1.93 - Did anyone understand what Euclid had to say about number
before John Gabriel?
John Gabriel
7/8/14
Read Re: 1.93 - Did anyone understand what Euclid had to say about number
before John Gabriel?
Brian Q. Hutchings
7/10/14
Read why did the untamed jungle fowl cross the iway
Brian Q. Hutchings

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.