Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: what part of Euclid did you never skim
Replies: 1   Last Post: Aug 4, 2014 2:40 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View  
Brian Q. Hutchings

Posts: 6,023
Registered: 12/6/04
what part of Euclid did you never skim
Posted: Aug 4, 2014 2:40 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

because, you are all sweetness & light, "there

> There is NO such thing as an irrational number.
>
>
>
> In his strange number system supposedly based on Euclid, he cannot even prove that 2+2=4.
>
>
>
> False. I showed this in an earlier comment. And because it's not important, I won't bother addressing again.





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.