The Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: § 534 Finis
Replies: 30   Last Post: Feb 22, 2015 8:14 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Virgil

Posts: 10,821
Registered: 6/8/11
Re: � 534 Finis
Posted: Aug 6, 2014 1:27 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <999808b7-26a6-4132-802a-84cdcf9f1f24@googlegroups.com>,
Zeit Geist <tucsondrew@me.com> wrote:

> On Wednesday, August 6, 2014 6:49:59 AM UTC-7, muec...@rz.fh-augsburg.de
> wrote:
>

> > Up to every desired n and q_n. Alas they belong to a finite initial
> > segment. Infinitely many follow. The infinite is never completed.

>
> You try to Show a Contradiction in Set Theory, so you take True Statements
> and Mix them with False Statements. In Set Theory, there does Not Exist any
> Infinite Sets that are Not "Complete". There simply ARE Infinite Sets. We
> Understand that you do Not like this Concept, but it is No way in
> Contradiction with the Other Axioms. You are free to Use a System with No
> Infinite Sets.
>

> > No complete bijection such that no element is missing, no complete list
> > (with respect to the natural numbers) so that another element, the
> > "anti-diagonal", could not be enumerated.
> >

>
> Are we talking Rationals or Reals here? Anti-diagonal?
> You seem Confused,
>

> > Regards, WM
>
> ZG


WM IS confused!
--
Virgil
"Mit der Dummheit kampfen Gotter selbst vergebens." (Schiller)



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2017. All Rights Reserved.