In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Sam Sung <email@example.com> wrote:
> firstname.lastname@example.org drivels: > > > I have a proof about all natural numbers. It applies to all natural > > numbers. > > It shows that "all natural numbers" is a non-existing notion in > > mathematics. > > Nonsense, once its defined, the set is there - consider this: > > Is the set of all chess positions completed although when there will > most probably never be a chance to list them all together? Yes, the > set of all chess positions is completed of course, BECAUSE it does > NOT CHANGE things, whether one prints them or prints them not - all > these chess positions are fixed by its DEFINING rules and NOTHING > CHANGES if one prints anyone of them or not.
At least not outside of WM's worthless world of WMytheology.
In a WMytheological Chess game, the rules would always flex in midgame in ways allowing WM always to win! -- Virgil "Mit der Dummheit kampfen Gotter selbst vergebens." (Schiller)