The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: § 534 Finis
Replies: 3   Last Post: Aug 18, 2014 1:24 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Ben Bacarisse

Posts: 1,972
Registered: 7/4/07
Re: § 534 Finis
Posted: Aug 17, 2014 11:32 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply writes:

> On Saturday, 16 August 2014 21:49:10 UTC+2, Ben Bacarisse wrote:

>> > What are the infinitely many elements that the cardinality measures?
>> The limit does not measure anything, because there is no "final set" for
>> it to measure. That is the core of you misunderstanding.

> Nothing? Well, may be. But if we neglect the limit, we are left with
> all natural numbers:
> Forall n: There are infinitely many rationals without index.

The above is undeniably true (given some details that I am sure apply in
this context).

> If there is no limit, then this is the final answer and cannot be
> changed.

What sort of mathematics has final answers and answers that can be
changed? The above is true. Period. It was true before you wrote it
down. It will be forever true (given the same definitions and axioms).

Does the WMglish phrase "the rationals can't be enumerated" simply mean
that all bijection from N to Q have the property that "for all n, there
are infinitely many rationals without index"? If so, I'll add it the


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.