Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: § 534 Finis
Replies: 1   Last Post: Aug 17, 2014 11:38 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View  
Ben Bacarisse

Posts: 1,535
Registered: 7/4/07
Re: § 534 Finis
Posted: Aug 17, 2014 11:38 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

PotatoSauce <kiwisquash@gmail.com> writes:

> On Saturday, August 16, 2014 3:49:10 PM UTC-4, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>>
>> You'd need to define the WMglish term "the set at omega". I explained
>> how set sequence limits can be defined in the little paper I wrote and
>> there is no "set at omega" involved.

>
> Do you mind sharing a link to the paper mentioned above?


Not at all: http://bsb.me.uk/dd-wealth.pdf

> I would be interested in reading it.

Suggestions welcomes since I suppose Professor Mueckenheim may well
point to it again, so that his next class of students can marvel at the
stupidity of set theorists. (Not that I am one.)

I would write something rather different now because I think I get
what's going on a bit better. In particular, I'd stress that fact that
their esteemed professor can have no objection to any of the limits used
to define the set limit.

--
Ben.



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.