The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: § 534 Finis
Replies: 1   Last Post: Aug 17, 2014 11:38 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View  
Ben Bacarisse

Posts: 1,972
Registered: 7/4/07
Re: § 534 Finis
Posted: Aug 17, 2014 11:38 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

PotatoSauce <> writes:

> On Saturday, August 16, 2014 3:49:10 PM UTC-4, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>> You'd need to define the WMglish term "the set at omega". I explained
>> how set sequence limits can be defined in the little paper I wrote and
>> there is no "set at omega" involved.

> Do you mind sharing a link to the paper mentioned above?

Not at all:

> I would be interested in reading it.

Suggestions welcomes since I suppose Professor Mueckenheim may well
point to it again, so that his next class of students can marvel at the
stupidity of set theorists. (Not that I am one.)

I would write something rather different now because I think I get
what's going on a bit better. In particular, I'd stress that fact that
their esteemed professor can have no objection to any of the limits used
to define the set limit.


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.