Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium
Replies:
5
Last Post:
Aug 19, 2014 12:35 PM




Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium
Posted:
Aug 18, 2014 5:05 PM


mueckenh@rz.fhaugsburg.de writes:
> On Monday, 18 August 2014 19:39:18 UTC+2, Zeit Geist wrote: <snip> >> This Shows NOTHING about the NonExistence of a Bijection from N to Q. > > It shows that there are not enough naturals to index all > rationals.
You agree that, given S(q) = 1 / (2 floor(q)  r + 1) and B(n) = S^n(1),
Q+ = image(B) B(p) = B(q) iff p = q for all n c N, exists q c Q+, q = B(n)
> More is not intended.
More than the above is not required. You can't express your apparent disagreement with set theory with anything like the clarity with which you've expressed your agreement with it.
 Ben.



