Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: � 534 Finis
Replies: 2   Last Post: Aug 20, 2014 5:56 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View  

Posts: 9,362
Registered: 6/8/11
Re: � 534 Finis
Posted: Aug 20, 2014 5:56 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <096f7bce-9d74-4911-b035-17e9d83e8c80@googlegroups.com>,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de wrote:

> On Tuesday, 19 August 2014 20:45:38 UTC+2, Zeit Geist wrote:

> > Reals CAN BE REPRESENTED by Sequences of Digits.
> >
> > Another Sublely you do Not Grasp.

> Only fools assume that they could read or write aleph_0 digits.

Does WM now claim that finite sequences of digits cannot represent real

Countably many reals can be represented by finite digit sequences.

In fact, ALL of the natural numbers can be so represented without even
the need for any decimal points.

The point is that MOST real numbers (uncountably many of them) CANNOT be
represented by TERMINATING decimals, even though infinitely many of them
can be so represented.
At least in the proper mathematics that is free from the idiotic
corruptions imposed by WM's worthless world of WMytheology.
"Mit der Dummheit kampfen Gotter selbst vergebens." (Schiller)

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2015. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.