Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!
Replies: 1   Last Post: Aug 23, 2014 3:48 PM

 Brian Q. Hutchings Posts: 6,427 Registered: 12/6/04
Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!
Posted: Aug 23, 2014 3:48 PM

it is just a simple, "degenerate case, normally of no interest ...
unless you're trying to re-invent, say L'Hopital's rules

> It's rather amusing because a circle is the set of loci equidistant from the same focus (that is, the centre). A circle of 0 area, has a set of loci that are equidistant from the circle centre and coincide with the centre itself.
>
>
>
> x^2 + y^2 = r^2 is a circle whose area is 0, iff, x=y=0.
>
>
>
> This is something that a mythmatician can't understand. But wait! Perhaps, 0 distance is not allowed in mainstream mythmatics? How about 0 area?
>
>
>
> I am laughing so hard once again, my stomach hurts!
>
>
>
> BTW: Read dullrich's comments - they are not only the most 'informative', but also the most entertaining. To wit, his 'counterexamples', are literally out of this world! Ha, ha!
>
>
>
> Comments are NOT welcome and no response will be provided. This comment is produced in the interests of public education; and to eradicate ignorance and stupidity from mainstream mythmatics.