```Date: Sep 22, 2017 10:01 AM
Author: Conway
Subject: Re: 0 = 1

On Friday, September 22, 2017 at 6:05:39 AM UTC-5, Markus Klyver wrote:> Den fredag 22 september 2017 kl. 04:20:06 UTC+2 skrev conway:> > > > > > And a dimension is not a line, and Euclid said no> > > such thing. Please stop being stupid on the Internet,> > > thank you.> > > > > > Markus> > > > > > Busted......apologize...admit you were wrong....or cease receiving replies from me.....> > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimension> > > > > > here it is again in case you don't like the wiki...> > > > > > http://www.dictionary.com/browse/dimensions> > > > > > Id ask you to stop being a troll on the internet...but...that's like asking the sun not to shine.......> > > > Good Luck to you Markus> > I don't see how this supports your case. If we are talking about physical measurements, then 0 has no dimension. If we are talking about some other concept of dimension in mathematics, it has to be more precise. In what way is 0 a dimension???!markusif we are talking about physical measurements.....then 0 has a dimension.  Can you show me NO dimension.  You can not.  EVERY where you look there is dimension. If I write zero...it has a dimension.  If I draw a dot, it has a dimension.  (disregarding Euclid).   I do agree however that I should work on more precise definitions.zero is the least of numbersnumbers represent existencethe least of existence ALWAYS contains a dimension.zero represents dimension "without a value" inside of it.A cup that is empty is zeroA cup that is full is the number 1A line is a dimension that has values(a set of numbers) inside it. A line that has no values inside it...is zero.
```