Date: Sep 22, 2017 3:43 PM
Author: Karl-Olav Nyberg
Subject: Re: 0 = 1

fredag 22. september 2017 16.02.12 UTC+2 skrev Conway følgende:
> On Friday, September 22, 2017 at 6:05:39 AM UTC-5, Markus Klyver wrote:
> > Den fredag 22 september 2017 kl. 04:20:06 UTC+2 skrev conway:
> > > >
> > > > And a dimension is not a line, and Euclid said no
> > > > such thing. Please stop being stupid on the Internet,
> > > > thank you.

> > >
> > >
> > > Markus
> > >
> > >
> > > Busted......apologize...admit you were wrong....or cease receiving replies from me.....
> > >
> > >
> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimension
> > >
> > >
> > > here it is again in case you don't like the wiki...
> > >
> > >
> > > http://www.dictionary.com/browse/dimensions
> > >
> > >
> > > Id ask you to stop being a troll on the internet...but...that's like asking the sun not to shine.......
> > >
> > > Good Luck to you Markus

> >
> > I don't see how this supports your case. If we are talking about physical measurements, then 0 has no dimension. If we are talking about some other concept of dimension in mathematics, it has to be more precise. In what way is 0 a dimension???!

>
> markus
>
> if we are talking about physical measurements.....then 0 has a dimension. Can you show me NO dimension. You can not. EVERY where you look there is dimension. If I write zero...it has a dimension. If I draw a dot, it has a dimension. (disregarding Euclid). I do agree however that I should work on more precise definitions.
>
>
> zero is the least of numbers
> numbers represent existence
> the least of existence ALWAYS contains a dimension.
> zero represents dimension "without a value" inside of it.
> A cup that is empty is zero
> A cup that is full is the number 1
>
> A line is a dimension that has values(a set of numbers) inside it.
> A line that has no values inside it...is zero.


A point in physics has no dimension (and also in mathematics). It is a singularity.
KON